RE: <rdf:li> as a typed node

> 
> This change shouldn't break earlier code since rdf:li as an element
> name was not explicitly in the old grammar (except by matching the
> old typedNode) and the feedback from the probably, only, implementors
> who looked at the change is the reason we are junking it!
> 
+1

I'll be absolutely heart-broken to delete the ARP code that does this!!

Jeremy

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 04:35:59 UTC