W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: PRIMER: new draft data model section

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:39:01 -0600
Message-ID: <3BF14CA5.F8A28D0B@w3.org>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
CC: fmanola@mitre.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
[...]
> > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> >
> > > Frank,
> > >
> > > I thought the draft on the data model section was
> > > very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear
> > > discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on
> > > to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-)
> >
> >
> > Yeah, well I didn't want to introduce (and have to explain) a new URI
> > scheme.  However, I can do that if you think it would make the
> > distinction clearer.
> 
> Actually, no. I think the recent "clarification" doesn't
> clarify much, and in fact I prefer your present treatment.

You owe uri@w3.org a comment to that effect, then.

> I just thought you might toss in a few tag URIs or similar
> to show a little more heterogeny.

Frank, don't use unregistered URI schemes.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 11:42:03 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:37 EDT