Re: PRIMER: new draft data model section

Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
[...]
> > Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> >
> > > Frank,
> > >
> > > I thought the draft on the data model section was
> > > very well written, and I'm happy to see the clear
> > > discussion about URLs vs. URIs (though you go on
> > > to use HTTP URLs for abstract concepts anyway ;-)
> >
> >
> > Yeah, well I didn't want to introduce (and have to explain) a new URI
> > scheme.  However, I can do that if you think it would make the
> > distinction clearer.
> 
> Actually, no. I think the recent "clarification" doesn't
> clarify much, and in fact I prefer your present treatment.

You owe uri@w3.org a comment to that effect, then.

> I just thought you might toss in a few tag URIs or similar
> to show a little more heterogeny.

Frank, don't use unregistered URI schemes.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 11:42:03 UTC