W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

RE: incomplete datatyping (was: Re: datatypes and MT)

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:30:59 +0200
Message-ID: <2BF0AD29BC31FE46B78877321144043162174E@trebe003.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Please see my discussion of prescriptive versus descriptive
role of rdfs:range in my recent summary of the X proposal.

Also, forgive me, but has no'one else read section 3 of the
RDF *Schema* spec?

We're talking about rdfs:range here, not rdf:range, right?
                       ^

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 09 November, 2001 11:33
> To: Pat Hayes
> Cc: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere); w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: incomplete datatyping (was: Re: datatypes and MT)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Pat Hayes wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> 
> > 
> > Am I the only person who has no idea what this 
> > normative/descriptive/prescriptive contrast means?
> 
> 
> No.
> 
> Which is why I have asked Patrick for concrete examples, 
> based on the various 
> proposals, to illucidate.
> 
> Brian
> 
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 15:31:54 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:36 EDT