> > The X proposal is incompatible with all current usage as it > requires > > all literals to be replaced with URVs. Actually no. It doesn't require it, even if it does advise it. And apologies for not getting the summary out sooner. URV's are a useful component of the X proposal, but not the heart of it. Have a look at my posting today, and let me know what you think. PatrickReceived on Monday, 12 November 2001 10:28:01 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:36 EDT