W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed issue resolutions

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 17:57:57 +0000
Message-ID: <3BE6D325.1000005@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Hi Aaron,

Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>
>> on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
> 
> 
> Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to define 
> two resources as equivalent by doing:
> 
> foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
> bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
> 
> Is this not true?


Well, its true for Properties,  and subClassOf will do it for classes.  I didn't 
think it could do it for arbritary resources though, without implying a type for 
them.

Brian
Received on Monday, 5 November 2001 13:02:46 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:30 EDT