W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: heading toward datatyping telecon

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 11:21:42 +0000
Message-ID: <3BE281C6.5020407@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org


Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]


> I really don't see an issue here.  Allowing literals as subjects in the 
> abstract graph, and in N-triples, doesn't change the RDF/XML syntax as 
> defined.  Furthermore, if we use Pat's MT work in conjunction with RDFS 
> closures, we can explain how to apply XML data types with the existing 
> RDF/XML syntax (even if we can't express the graphs that result from 
> RDFS closure in the existing RDF/XML syntax).


Oops, am I missing something.  Graham, how should I write:

   "subject" <rdf:type> <rdf:Literal> .

in RDF/XML?

Brian
Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 06:26:32 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:28 EDT