Re: heading toward datatyping telecon

Graham Klyne wrote:

[...]


> I really don't see an issue here.  Allowing literals as subjects in the 
> abstract graph, and in N-triples, doesn't change the RDF/XML syntax as 
> defined.  Furthermore, if we use Pat's MT work in conjunction with RDFS 
> closures, we can explain how to apply XML data types with the existing 
> RDF/XML syntax (even if we can't express the graphs that result from 
> RDFS closure in the existing RDF/XML syntax).


Oops, am I missing something.  Graham, how should I write:

   "subject" <rdf:type> <rdf:Literal> .

in RDF/XML?

Brian

Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 06:26:32 UTC