Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > { [ is log:resolvesTo of <rdfc25May.n3> ] log:includes > [ is log:resolvesTo of <,xx.n3> ] } log:implies { :test1 a :Success > }. Isn't the requirement here a bit more stringent? log:includes, at least from the name, implies a sort of subClass semantics -- that one includes the triples of the other, but may include other triples. Shouldn't we insure that a processor _only_ generates the correct triples and nothing more? Or am I misunderstanding log:includes? -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com> ]Received on Thursday, 31 May 2001 21:39:05 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:55 EDT