W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

www-archive for big attachments [was: schema given the (Pnnn) treatment too...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:37:35 -0500
Message-ID: <3B1521CF.F850AC4C@w3.org>
To: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Jan Grant wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 May 2001, Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> > Jan,
> >
> > Thanks for this.  It could be very useful.
> >
> > How about sending it to the list as an html attachement and then we'll
> > have it in the archive to refer to.
> 
> Stunningly good idea. Apologies for size, here they are. Schema to
> follow.

I find great big attachments to be something of a burden...
your mention of "apologies" suggests you do too...

W3C has a mailing list set up *just* so you can mail
stuff* there to get an archive pointer: www-archive@w3.org
(archived at http://www.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/ )
so my preference would be: send big attachments to www-archive
and then send notice (including a pointer) to w3c-rdfcore-wg.

That's my preference, but I know of some folks that actually
prefer to receive copies of documents rather than pointers,
so I leave it to the chairs and/or staff contacts to
decide which policy, if any, best serves the needs of
the group.


*stuff related to W3C work, that is. It only accepts
mail from folks that are subscribed to some W3C mailing list.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2001 12:38:44 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:54 EDT