W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Action Item: proposal for posting resolved issues

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:40:15 -0400
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010529134015.B26985@w3.org>
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 05:44:22PM +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:
> I think rather:
>    [6.19] Qname          ::= NSprefix ':' name
> i.e. compulsory prefix, but I'll work on a full list of grammar changes

Yes, thanks Dave - that's what I meant.

> > I would not expect these type of changes to be placed in the
> > errata.  As a convenience to the WG (and the RDF community), I
> > think it would be useful to consolidate these type of changes
> > in a document as I have described.  All changes in that document
> > would be subject to some type of "it's not over till it's over"
> > provisio as I stated previously.
> I'm also uncomfortable calling this errata, but would prefer to have
> some statement in the errata for RDF M&S, Schema pointing at the
> resolved issues document - some words needed here saying "watch out,
> here are the changes subsequent to this document, changing the syntax
> and model".  The resolved issues document could then give more details
> on the state of proposed changes for those documents.

That all seems OK with me.

Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2001 13:40:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:48 UTC