General syntax: infoset of BNF?

At 09:49 AM 5/25/01 +0100, Jan Grant wrote:
>Perhaps we might stick with a simple grammar for serialised RDF and
>include something to the effect:
>
>         "any stream of XML tokens that is equivalent to this
>         serialisation (wrt. {a subset of the XML infoset})
>         is also a valid serialised form, and should be
>         interpreted equivalently."

I'd not object to that.  My suggestion was for the Infoset version to be 
the main reference, and an informational grammar be included as an appendix.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------