W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: RDFCore WG 2001-05-25 Teleconference Agenda

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 01:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0105250125000.24119-100000@tux.w3.org>


On Thu, 24 May 2001, Brian McBride wrote:

> > A3: Ora Lassilla/ send analysis (#rdf-container-syntax-ambiguity and
> >     Dan Brickley  #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema)to rdfcore-wg list
> > 15  re issues:
> >   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity
> >   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema
> >
> >   Owner Dan Brickley
> >
> >   Discussion re understanding of the issue as in Dan/Ora's message:
> >
> >     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001May/0113.html

Disapointed to say this, but having failed to make sufficient progress
with this issue in the past few days I would like to relinquish some of
the 15-mins of agenda time allocated for today's discussion.

I am also (due attendance at an offsite meeting) going to be joining by
mobile phone, likely without IRC/Web access, so don't feel in a position
to lead effective discussion of the containers-model issue at this point.

Brian, could you (again my apologies for the timing) reorder the agenda

As a stopgap, I'll report my current thinking/progress by email here.
I am now of the opinion that some relatively minor rewording of the formal
model portion of the specification, plus ammendments/additions to Dave and
Brian's 'Container syntax' proposal will allow us to deal with the
'representing partially described containers' of the container issue.
Brief version: "use rdf:li for complete description of containers; use
rdf:_n for partial descriptions; amend spec to make this distinction

I hope to have a complete and coherent proposal to the list in time for
discussion at the next meeting.


(who is coming to terms with his first hard disk failure in 5 years, and
giving thanks for CVS...)
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 01:37:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:48 UTC