W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Issue #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:57:30 -0400
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Cc: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, w3c-rdfcore-wg <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <20010524165730.A10470@w3.org>
Aaron - I'm trying to understand the ramification
of the change you are proposing.

On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:07:00PM -0700, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> <rdf:Description>
>    <propName rdf:ID="foo" rdf:resource="bar"/>
> </rdf:Description>
> would also assign foo the the reification of the statement.

Would you please enumerate the triples you would
expect from the above RDF if it was legal (and doing so 
in Subject, Pred, Object format ala SiRPAC would be much 

Also, what triples would you expect if the RDF was:

 <rdf:Description about="some_resource">
    <propName rdf:ID="foo" rdf:resource="bar"/>


Received on Thursday, 24 May 2001 16:58:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:48 UTC