Re: Issue rdfms-uri-substructure

Likewise, myself.

It feels a little untidy, but I can't see that it's broken.

#g

At 05:47 PM 5/17/01 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>URI: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-uri-substructure
>
>This issue seems to be a simple misunderstanding. As explained in a reply by
>Brian McBride[1] the spec clearly states that the composition function is
>simple concatenation. I see no issue here. Can we just take it off the list?
>Or is there something I'm missing?
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Jul/0038.html
>--
>[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 08:54:38 UTC