W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 18:08:13 +0100
Message-Id: <>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 09:40 AM 5/3/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote:
>Reading the original mail mesage that raised the issue, the reason why an RDF
>mime type is thought to  be required is to support content 
>negotiation.  Do you
>believe that this is the only motivation, or are there others that we should
>capture?  The current characterization of the issue in the IL document isn't
>very clear.  Would you be able to write some words describing the problem that
>could be included there?

Speculating... it might also be that a MIME type for RDF needs to be stated 
so that fragment identifiers can be interpreted (though just specifying 
application/xml would be enought for that purpose).


Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 12:00:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:48 UTC