- From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 01:46:42 +0100
- To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 11:21 AM 4/23/01 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote: >I ask the RDF Core WG consider the proposal for this issue >based on the document written by Brian McBride and myself: > > A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers > http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/current.htm > >where we make several proposals: > > 1. remove the ambiguity by making the container productions > part of the typedNode (6.13) production > 2. make rdf:li legal wherever propName (6.14) can be used > 3. describe rules for processing rdf:li into specific enumerated > rdf:_<n> properties That sounds fine to me. I thought your paper on interpretation of containers was very good. > 4. give a description of the interaction with rdf:aboutEach I'd like to see rdf:aboutEach removed from the core, being a feature that exists in the XML syntax without any corresponding representation in the RDF graph. (If still needed, I would expect it to be re-introduced in a syntax-only document.) >although #4 may need to be deferred dependent on what, if anything is >done with rdf:aboutEach. > >The above have no or minimal impact on existing deployed RDF or >parsers, and actually make the grammar more regular for parsing. #g
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 23:16:42 UTC