- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 13:14:12 -0500
- To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org> wrote: > Does this mean that instead of changing the grammar as recommended > in 1. in [2], that some text like that which is found in the IRC > log (RESOLVED: strongly ...) will be added to the spec? I cannot speak for the rest of the group, but it was my understanding that the grammar would be corrected but a portion would be added to the spec noting the issue, the fact that it is currently in use, and that it is strongly deprecated and not likely to be included future versions. -- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| my.info <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://my.theinfo.org> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the future of news, today
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2001 14:14:24 UTC