W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Followup on rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 13:14:12 -0500
To: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B715B8A2.A83D%aswartz@upclink.com>
Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org> wrote:

> Does this mean that instead of changing the grammar as recommended
> in 1. in [2], that some text like that which is found in the IRC
> log (RESOLVED: strongly ...) will be added to the spec?

I cannot speak for the rest of the group, but it was my understanding that
the grammar would be corrected but a portion would be added to the spec
noting the issue, the fact that it is currently in use, and that it is
strongly deprecated and not likely to be included future versions.

Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|           my.info
  <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |   <http://my.theinfo.org>
AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|  the future of news, today
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2001 14:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:48 UTC