- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:47:07 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
- CC: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Dan Brickley wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] > > As I say, I don't see any need to special-case > > rdf:Description in the grammar. > > If we take this reading of the syntax, then the presence of > rdf:Description asserts an rdf:type relationship between the described > resource and an rdfs:Class called rdf:Description. That's not what I meant; I don't think it's what I said, either. The question of what triples a document denotes once you've decided it matches the grammar is a whole other kettle of worms. Yes, in that part, we'd need an exception ala Don't emit a type arc if the element name is rdf:Description But that needn't gunk up the grammar. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 10:47:22 UTC