W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Abstract syntax: an attempt

From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:22:15 -0500
Message-Id: <v0421010cb75a4d2ff19c@[]>
To: fmanola@mitre.org
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Sergey Melnik wrote:
> >
> > Brian,
> >
> > I'd just like to reiterate some of the arguments for making reification
> > a built-in feature (possibly as an optional layer):
> >
> > - in M&S, reified statements need to have a URI. It looks like they
> > should be unique, but nobody wants to deal with uniqueness, but still
> > some sort of URIs need to be assigned, so we end up having to deal with
> > different URIs denoting the same statement etc.
> >
> > - in M&S, we need a specific vocabulary to express/use reification.
> > Reification could be defined without relying on vocabularies.
> >
> > - as defined in M&S, reification is extremely verbose and clumsy both in
> > APIs and in the syntax, and very few people are using it as suggested.
> > However, I personally believe it is a useful feature when introduced
> > correctly and compactly, and it can be easily handled in APIs and
> > databases as an intrinsic model feature.
> >
> > Finally, (s1 p1 (s2 p2 o2)) looks nicer in the abstract syntax...
>I, for one, would find it easier to follow these discussions if we
>distinguished the "reification" that is currently defined in the M&S
>(which involves creating multiple triples, rather than nesting the
>triple that is to be reified) from alternative notations like (s1 p1 (s2
>p2 o2)).  I agree the latter is much nicer,

I agree. In fact if there was some way to 'nest' assertions in RDF, 
it would be a vastly different and greatly improved language. 
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, that cannot be feasibly done 
within the confines of the basic RDF 1 model (ie without introducing 
some changes in the basic triples idea, such as N3's {'contexts'} ) 
other than by using something like RDF containers, which have exactly 
the verbose and clumsy translation that Sergey doesnt like. Drew 
McDermott and Jon Borden and I have been trying hard to do it, but we 
can't see how.

Pat Hayes

IHMC					(850)434 8903   home
40 South Alcaniz St.			(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola,  FL 32501			(850)202 4440   fax
Received on Monday, 25 June 2001 10:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:49 UTC