W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: draft partitioning of the issues

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:26:52 -0500
Message-Id: <200106221929.f5MJTVQ16813@theinfo.org>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
On Friday, June 22, 2001, at 01:37  PM, Brian McBride wrote:

> Per my action from today's telecon, I've taken a first pass at 
> assigning
> issues to partitions.

Thanks for doing this Brian, I think it'll be a big help. Some comments:

mime-types-for-rdf-docs:
	I don't think this is an abstract syntax issue, although I'm not really
	sure where it fits. If there's no better place for it then we can just
	leave it here.

I also believe the following issues are in scope for the Working Group:

rdfms-literals-as-resources and rdfms-literalsubjects:
	A large body of implementation and user experience shows the 
need for these
	issues to be clarified. I think that there is certainly room for
	clarification of this within the charter of the Working Group.

rdf-equivalent-uri's:
	Experience with the DAML specification has shown equivalence 
to be a useful
	and perhaps even essential property. It's absence from the 
schema spec is,
	in my opinion, an error.

Thanks,
--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 15:26:55 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:15 EDT