At 06:06 PM 6/15/01 +0100, Brian McBride wrote: >RDFCore: A base abstract syntax and a semantics for it. The abstract syntax >is equivalent to n-triple (can n-triple be that abstract syntax). Nothing >more - does not include type, containers, reification. [...] >Vocabularies (aka standard library): Reification and containers I think that, to serve its intended purpose, that "reification" will need to be handled in the core. A message I have taken from the RDF-logic discussion that it is really an abstract syntactic device to allow us to express statement "nesting" (i.e. use without assertion). See also my separate "abstract syntax" message. #g ------------------------------------------------------------ Graham Klyne Baltimore Technologies Strategic Research Content Security Group <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com> <http://www.mimesweeper.com> <http://www.baltimore.com> ------------------------------------------------------------Received on Saturday, 16 June 2001 06:22:03 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:10 EDT