On Friday, June 15, 2001, at 06:49 PM, Sergey Melnik wrote: > IMO reification has a chance to be introduced as a pure model feature > not intrinsically bound to any vocabulary Why do you want this? Is there a reason every RDF application has to understand reification? I hope not, because that will make RDF very confusing. > In this perspective, it would not go under 'vocabularies'. Similarly, > namespaces and literals are another two model features that might go > into one of the layers in the 'core'. To my knowledge, you still have not explained how namespaces fit into the model. If I missed this somewhere, please send me a pointer. I'm quite curious what you mean. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 19:52:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:10 EDT