Sergey Melnik wrote: > With respect to this and other syntax issues, I'd like to remind of the > "roundtrip" test, which have been raised many times on RDF Interest: an > RDF tool must be able to parse, serialize, parse, serialize etc. without > loss of information, i.e., on every parse, exactly the same set of > statements is produced. Notice that after the first parse, rdf:ID will > be necessarity replaced by rdf:about, since the model does not > intrinsically capture the information about its origin. If <rdf:Description rdf:ID="foo"/> is defined to be equivalent to, i.e. represents the same triples as: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#foo"/> and the round tripping test is defined to be that XML/RDF before represents the same triples as the XML/RDF after (i.e. model equivalence) which I think is the test that you suggest, then this solution passes the round triping test. BrianReceived on Thursday, 14 June 2001 14:31:45 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:08 EDT