W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: #rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity, #rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
cc: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106131614000.14107-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> > When you say _1 is functional, is that a property of
> > rdf:_1 wherever it is found, or is that a property of rdf:_1
> > when it is applied to containers?
>
> Also where is this property specified?

section 5 ('formal model') of M+S suggests that _n properties are
functional (a term introduced to RDF by the DAML+OIL specs I believe) when
applied to M+S containers. I believe it is silent w.r.t. other uses...

dan
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2001 16:17:20 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:07 EDT