W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2001

Re: rdfc25May.n3 testcase

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:37:16 +0100
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Cc: connolly@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, timbl@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF0F06E7F1.325F4378-ON41256A62.005A285D@bayer-ag.com>

(I have to update my own message)

> DanC wrote [...]
> > It turned out to be operator error. After fixing
> > some relative references and such, I'm able to
> > copy rdfc25May.n3 to ,xx.n3 and get cwm to --think
> > about this:
> >
> >   @prefix log: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log#>.
> >   @prefix : <#>.
> >
> >   { [ is log:resolvesTo of <rdfc25May.n3> ] log:includes
> >     [ is log:resolvesTo of <,xx.n3> ] } log:implies { :test1 a :Success
> > }.
> >
> > for a while; after 10 or 20 seconds, it concludes
> >
> >  :test1 a :Success.
> >
> > Then if I edit ,xxx.n3 and add one more statment, cwm no
> > longer --think's that rdfc25May.n3 includes ,xx.n3.
>
> I tried it also and it works very well (but I didn't
> use the comma in the name, maybe a DOS problem?)
> and on my laptap it's just a couple of seconds.
> Great!
> I spent a couple of hours last night to find bugs
> (swapping statements, changing """ quoted text, using
> {} examples [...] (that sometimes takes a long time e.g.
> http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/gedcom-relations.n3
> is still running (i hope not in a loop) and that
> since the last 5 hours))

well it's actually still running (104 hours)
so what's the expectation?
(this of course not a big issue for our normal
n3-triples resources)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

ps we also (still) have a problem in Euler for
   such cases in that we are disabling too much
   of the inferencing with the -core command line
   option
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 11:37:50 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:37:01 EDT