- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:07:41 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Monday, July 16, 2001, at 04:28 PM, Brian McBride wrote: > Properties with a language attribute are represented by a different > triple structure from those without (though those without could > be represented in a similar structure with the xml:lang property > omitted). I think this is really another option -- I'll call it 2b: <rdf:Description> <foo:bar>foobar</foo:bar> </rdf:Description> _:a foo:bar _:b . _:b rdf:value "foobar" . Can we have a straw poll on what people want to go with? My vote (in order of preference): 2 (anonnode w/ xml:lang), 2b (anonnode always), 5 (remove it and recommend something else). > ITS JUST HORRIBLE! I just liked this comment... it's definitely how I feel sometimes. :-) -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 21:07:58 UTC