W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources

From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:00:29 -0500
Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>, Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>, RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010716150030.PZGD5550.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@localhost>
On Thursday, July 12, 2001, at 06:29  AM, Dan Brickley wrote:

> emitting the 'same' invented-URIs for un-named resource mentions is
> risky: if we make the generated ID purely a function of the 
> bag-of-bytes
> XML document we could get situations where relative URIs are used to
> mention _different_ resources, but result in a parser emitting the same
> generated ID. I don't have time to cook up an example right 
> here, but for
> eg. <foo rdf:resource="../index.html"/> in different contexts means
> something different, so an rdf/xml doc including that might be 
> mentioning
> a different pair of resources.

Well, obviously the URI generated would have to be based upon 
the base URI of the document -- otherwise it wouldn't work, as 
you point out.

Does that solve the issue? If not, can you provide more specifics?

--
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 11:00:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:10 EDT