W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@baltimore.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:36:56 +0100
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010716131143.035beec0@joy.songbird.com>
To: "Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM" <spetschu@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 10:55 AM 7/13/01 -0400, Stephen Petschulat/CanWest/IBM wrote:
>Agreed. Note that it brings the Subject into the RDF graph... the lack of
>arcs itself can be meaningful.

Really?

That (i.e. "the lack of arcs itself can be meaningful") goes against my 
understanding of RDF.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended 
for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or 
there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for direct, 
special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration of the 
contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being 
passed on.

This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept by 
Baltimore MIMEsweeper for Content Security threats, including
computer viruses.
Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 10:51:43 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:10 EDT