W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:31:54 +0100
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010711172940.03d5e480@joy.songbird.com>
To: Sergey Melnik <melnik@db.stanford.edu>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, bdehora@interx.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 02:52 PM 7/10/01 -0700, Sergey Melnik wrote:
>resource (constant) = URI, name, referring expression

I think that's clearly at odds with RFC2396 (which seems the nearest thing 
we have to a universally accepted starting point for defining these things):

[RFC 2396, section 1.1]:

       Resource
          A resource can be anything that has identity.  Familiar
          examples include an electronic document, an image, a service
          (e.g., "today's weather report for Los Angeles"), and a
          collection of other resources.  Not all resources are network
          "retrievable"; e.g., human beings, corporations, and bound
          books in a library can also be considered resources.

etc.

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<Graham.Klyne@Baltimore.com>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 13:29:13 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:08 EDT