RE: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08

Hi Dave,

Should the blankline production have a rhs? I'm guessing
the rhs should be eoln?

Bill

----
Bill de hÓra  :  InterX  :  bdehora@interx.com


:-----Original Message-----
:From: Dave Beckett [mailto:dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk]
:Sent: 08 July 2001 20:43
:To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
:Subject: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
:
:
:
:I've updated the N-Triples document at:
:
:   N-Triples
:   http://purl.org/net/dajobe/2001/06/ntriples/
:
:   (RCS v1.4)
:
:following comments here and privately and made the following changes:
:  Reworked grammar to bring out line basis.
:  Remove vertical tab from ws.
:  Made eoln be: cr? lf
:    -- it can't really be only cr lf since that would make all
:       existing ntriples examples illegal
:  Added string escaping section
:  Removed URI encoding issue
:  Split references into history + references sections
:  Added section numbers, links
:  Updated unicode encoding issues
:  Lots of rewording.
:
:There are still some unresolved issues at
:  http://purl.org/net/dajobe/2001/06/ntriples/#sec-issues
:that I'd appreciate feedback to resolve.
:
:Dave
:
:
:_____________________________________________________________________
:This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
:delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
:information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or
:alternatively call
:Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
:

Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 08:35:57 UTC