- From: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 15:57:43 -0500
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Cc: RDF core WG <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, July 5, 2001, at 09:23 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
> In particular, it is not clear to me from the current M&S that
> (so-called) anonymous resources are anything more than a purely
> syntactic issue -- that a parser resolves by supplying a unique
> "genid".
I tend to agree. However, if they do have meaning, I would like
to see that special meaning represented using standard triples,
not a special representation in the abstract syntax. One example
is the log:forSome property use in CWM.
Please keep this possibility in mind during your work.
Thanks,
--
"Aaron Swartz" | ...schoolyard subversion...
<mailto:me@aaronsw.com> | <http://aaronsw.com/school/>
<http://www.aaronsw.com/> | because school makes kids dumb
Received on Sunday, 8 July 2001 16:57:47 UTC