W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?

From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:45:23 +0100
To: "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <69B15B675E99D411A4110008C786DA2301368F05@exwest_01.interx.com>
Pushing aside resource mumbo jumbo (red herrings). To me, it
comes down to these 3 questions:

1: Feasibility: can we give RDF Literals URIs in the M&S and
stay within the charter?

2: Validity: should we give RDF Literals URIs in the M&S?

3: Purpose: if we did give RDF Literals URIs, what are we
using the RDF to describe? (it's not at all clear to me)


Bill de hÓra  :  InterX  :  bdehora@interx.com

:-----Original Message-----
:From: Aaron Swartz [mailto:me@aaronsw.com]
:Sent: 05 July 2001 23:24
:To: Brian McBride
:Cc: Ron Daniel; rdf core
:Subject: Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?

Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 04:46:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:50 UTC