W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-06 Agenda

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 15:13:46 +0100
Message-ID: <3B44761A.C444F334@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Time:
   10:00:00 Fri Jul 06 2001 in America/New_York
 
 which according to:
 
   http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
 
 converts to:
 
   15:00:00 Fri Jul 06 2001 in Europe/London 
   23:00:00 Fri Jul 06 2001 in Asia/Tokyo
 
 Phone Number: +1 630 536 3003 room #3003 
 
 irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore
 
WELCOME, ROLL CALL, SCRIBE 

REVIEW AGENDA

REVIEW MINUTES OF MEETING on 29th June 2001

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jul/0000.html


CONFIRM FOLLOWING ACTIONS COMPLETED (1 min)

ACTION: 2001-06-29#1: Brian McBride: put the writeup online.

   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#attention-developers

ACTION: 2001-06-29#2: Ron Daniel: post an analysis of where the
    distinction of ID and about has been used.

ACTION: 2001-06-29#5: Jan Grant, Eric Miller, Martyn Horner:
    generate use cases and requirements for language (xml:lang) and
    literals.

REVIEW STATUS OF FOLLOWING ACTIONS (5 min)

ACTION: JUN-01-01-#9: Ora: send a note to the WG that describes
   how aboutEach is being used and how it was implemented

ACTION: 2001-06-22#2: Brian: Write a draft on what issues are in scope,
        how are they allocated to partitions, what are the dependencies.

ACTION: 2001-06-22#3: All: Post issue priorities with reasons

ACTION: 2001-06-22#4: Sergey: Summarize priorities that are posted

ACTION: 2001-06-22#5: DanBri: Get a draft of RDFSchema to the group.

ACTION: 2001-06-22#7: Brian: Do a writeup of the containers proposal.

ACTION  2001-06-08#2: Dan Brickley: write up decision to allow partial
                      descriptions of containers up in more detail for the
                      list

ACTION: 2001-06-29#3: Ron Daniel: post an email about how support of
    xml:base would generate different things in RDF/XML parsers.

ACTION: 2001-06-29#4: Brian McBride: Update the
      http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-uri-substructure
   issue to add Sergey's question:
      Namespaces are used as an abbreviation in the syntax - is it
      syntactic sugar or part of the model?

ACTION: 2001-06-29#5: Jan Grant, Eric Miller:
    generate use cases and requirements for language (xml:lang) and
    literals.


ISSUE rdfms-literals-as-resources (15 mins)

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literals-as-resources

  see also:

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Jul/0021.html

Consider the following questions:

  Q1: Does the formal model described in M&S have a distinguished 
      representation for literals?

If the answer to the above is YES, then:

  Q2: Is there a compelling reason why we should make this change?


Review status on the open issues:

  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-graph
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-and-range
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-domain-unconstrained
  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-xml-base


Next meeting - 10am Boston time, 13th July 2001.

AOB (5 mins)

CLOSE
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 10:16:02 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:06 EDT