W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2001

RE: Literals as Resources (was RE: draft partitioning of the issues)

From: Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 00:04:53 -0700
To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>
Cc: "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEKICCGFEKJFGKMFLEPCELOCPAA.rdaniel@interwoven.com>
Aaron said:

> I simply don't 
> understand how a Literal is not a resource -- something with 
> identity.

Of course they *could* be identified. But the point is that
the M&S spec says literals are given 'by value' instead
of 'by reference'. 

But this topic seems out of scope.
 
Ron Daniel Jr.
Standards Architect
Tel: +1 415 778 3113
Fax: +1 415 778 3131
Email: rdaniel@interwoven.com 

Visit www.interwoven.com
Moving Business to the Web 
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 03:06:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:06 EDT