- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:53:35 +0100
- To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Patrick: > 10. Section 5.27, some discussion (possibly) should be provided for > scenarios where there is a mingling of rdf:li and rdf:_n in the actual > serialization. Should li-counter consider the explicit _n values? > Should it ensure resume counting after the explicit _n value? Does > the parser have to ensure no collisions or does it create a partial > ordering? These issues were all resolved before I joined the WG. The rdf:li is a simply macro that starts at 1 for each element and increments on each occurrence. Nothing clever. I guess following the issues list gets to the discussion eventually. Jeremy
Received on Sunday, 16 December 2001 11:45:26 UTC