Patrick: > 10. Section 5.27, some discussion (possibly) should be provided for > scenarios where there is a mingling of rdf:li and rdf:_n in the actual > serialization. Should li-counter consider the explicit _n values? > Should it ensure resume counting after the explicit _n value? Does > the parser have to ensure no collisions or does it create a partial > ordering? These issues were all resolved before I joined the WG. The rdf:li is a simply macro that starts at 1 for each element and increments on each occurrence. Nothing clever. I guess following the issues list gets to the discussion eventually. JeremyReceived on Sunday, 16 December 2001 11:45:26 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:43:03 EDT