- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 00:16:32 +0100
- To: dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Hi Dave,
> I attach a copy of the syntax document for your consideration
> for publication as a working draft. I think the following people
> were actioned to review it (no minutes as of this date recording it)
>
> Jeremy Carroll
> Jos De Roo
> Patrick Stickler
>
> but others, feel free :)
>
> The attached files corresponds to CVS version 1.333 of
> http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/
>
> (CVS http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/rdfcore/syntax/index.html )
>
> plus the attached relaxng which are for information, not part of
> the document, but are intended to be published with the working draft.
>
> I think I need to carry on trying to improve the very new section 2
> but it could be published as is.
in "3 Data Model" last line
... part of the node ro computed from the string-value of contained nodes.
^^or
in "3.6 Identifier Node" 2nd sentence
... These nodes are created by giving two values for the for the ...
^^^^^^^
in "5.9 Production resourcePropertyElt" the N-Triples statement
... e.parent.subject.string-value <e.URI> n.subject.string-value; .
^
I would propose to drop reification!
so proposal to drop its sentences in 5.5, 5.9, 5.10, 5.11, 5.12 and 5.14
as well as "5.26 Reification Rules"
--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
PS my review is in no sense complete (I lost half of this day
with a serious panic situation in my family today, but it
was a false alarm, and everything is alright now, luckily)
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2001 18:16:52 UTC