W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2001

RDF/XML Syntax Internal Working Draft V1.23 issues and comments

From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 14:23:45 +0100
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <19953.999264225@tatooine.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

This is mostly for the record; I'll speak to these as necessary.


Various rewordings, spellings, minor typos (Jos, Art, Brian): Yes
Other parsetypes (Art): Yes
Amend status words (Brian): Yes
Replace charter words (Brian): Yes
Reword typeAttr ambiguity (Brian): Yes


Re-join empty/non-empty productions: No.
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0166.html
  My analysis:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0167.html


Optional rdf:RDF (Aaron)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0168.html
  A new issue for Aaron? :)
  Maybe related to infoset [document] information item

Container removal trick, confusion (Art)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0211.html
  Unsure, maybe ask for developer feedback - does this make
  containers clearer?

Add/remove <ins>, <del>, css style; (X)HTML versions (DanC, Brian)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0222.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0227.html
  Need docs rules advice, WAI.

IDs (Brian, Satoshi)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0237.html
  Yes, I've got it wrong here, attribute values in infoset are all
  CDATA, attribute type is from DTD only if present.  Will redo.

References (Brian)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0229.html
  Will check only cited docs are present.
  It is intended N-Triples will be cited in future, that is why it
  was there.  Maybe now cite the draft test cases doc rather than
  N-Triples.

Title (FrankM)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0233.html
  Yes, it does need changing.  I suggest: Refactoring RDF/XML Syntax

Dave
Received on Friday, 31 August 2001 09:23:46 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:50 EDT