W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2001

Re: Issue http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusioN

From: Art Barstow <barstow@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:30:35 -0400
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, RDF Comments <www-rdf-comments@w3.org>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <20010425093035.F7845@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:22:23AM -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> Re: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Apr/0047.html
> 
> > [[
> >   All elements and attributes in RDF must be namespace qualified
> > ]]
> 
> What is the reasoning for "all elements" being part of this requirement?
> Many current RDF documents use default namespaces properly to default
> elements. Is there a reason for disqualifying this practice?

Perhaps something like:

 [[
   Unqualified elements and attributes in RDF are discouraged
 ]]

would be better.

Art
---
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 09:31:56 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:05 EDT