I ask the RDF Core WG consider the proposal for this issue based on the document written by Brian McBride and myself: A Proposed Interpretation of RDF Containers http://www-uk.hpl.hp.com/people/bwm/rdf/issues/containersyntax/current.htm where we make several proposals: 1. remove the ambiguity by making the container productions part of the typedNode (6.13) production 2. make rdf:li legal wherever propName (6.14) can be used 3. describe rules for processing rdf:li into specific enumerated rdf:_<n> properties 4. give a description of the interaction with rdf:aboutEach although #4 may need to be deferred dependent on what, if anything is done with rdf:aboutEach. The above have no or minimal impact on existing deployed RDF or parsers, and actually make the grammar more regular for parsing. DaveReceived on Monday, 23 April 2001 06:21:59 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:04 EDT