Re: RDF changes

Frank Manola wrote:
> 
> This sounds like a sensible idea to me.  It would be a useful rough
> classification of the issues, along the lines Brian suggested earlier.
> For one thing, a formal semantics of just the triple model should be a
> relatively straightforward exercise (e.g., using those developed for
> DAML+OIL).

Right.  Anyone want to volunteer to propose a core triple model
and (by reference?) semantics.

Brian