> I don't see any mention of test cases in your list. > I hope resolution of each issue takes the form of > a test case. Good point. > I propose that one of the first issues we tackle is > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-ns-prefix-confusion > because it impacts lots of running code that I've run > into, and because there's a test case in the www-rdf-comments > archive. OK. Can we also take a look at: http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-reification-required http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-empty-property-elements http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/Overview.html#rdfms-resource-semantics the last of which is a step towards a more formal core model. BrianReceived on Monday, 23 April 2001 02:41:22 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:35:04 EDT