Just to speak for a different part of IBM... I strongly agree with you and disagree with John. I think it would be a big mistake to change the current definition of C14N. There are too many ways for new and old software and to-be-signed data files to interact that could end up with misleading errors, false negatives, or excessive work. And as mother always said, "two wrongs don't make a right." /r$ -- SOA Appliance Group IBM Application Integration Middleware * This address is going away; please use rsalz@us.ibm.com *Received on Friday, 16 December 2005 16:11:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C0.50 : Friday, 16 December 2005 16:11:38 GMT