W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Schema centric canonicalization - Need and status

From: Anders Rundgren <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:09:01 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <31578175.1132157341761.JavaMail.tomcat@pne-ps4-sn2>
To: reagle@mit.edu
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org

Thanx Joseph,

It probably does.
A question though arises when we are talking standards: Does this work 
have major support?  The paper is very hard to read, not a single 
example.  Although only experts should deal with XML canonicalization, 
experience shows that quite a lot of people roll their own stuff due to 
a need to integrate with other pieces that may not fit publicly 
available libraries.


----Original Message----
From: reagle@mit.edu
Date: Nov 16, 2005 4:43:45 PM
To: Josseline <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subj: Re: Schema centric canonicalization - Need and status

On Wednesday 16 November 2005 10:17, you wrote:
> Essentially I have two options.  Cripple schemas or invent a new 
> algorithm.

Does this not work?
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 16:09:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:21:40 UTC