- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:35:50 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson), John Boyer <JBoyer@PureEdge.com>, Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>, Gabe Wachob <gwachob@wachob.com>, public-xml-id@w3.org, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
> / Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk> was heard to say: > | Canonical XML also suggests making *all* URIs in the document > | absolute. > That seems impossible in the general case. Presumably that's why they say the application should do it, rather than the canonicalization process. But it is of course a fallacy to assume that there is always some one application that fully understands a document. -- Richard
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 21:36:08 UTC