W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: MIME type for detached signatures?

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:53:25 -0500
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: jose.kahan@w3.org, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-Id: <200504011053.26118.reagle@mit.edu>


On Friday 01 April 2005 10:51, Rich Salz wrote:
> I assume "no on set looks" is really "once it looks" :)

Yes, speech recognition error!

> The benefit of an XMLDSIG MIME type is that the MIME processor would now
> know to hand that piece off to the security app(let).

Ok.

Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 15:53:20 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tommy Lindberg: "Re: Further XML-SIG errata?"
Previous message: Rich Salz: "Re: MIME type for detached signatures?"
In reply to: Rich Salz: "Re: MIME type for detached signatures?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Friday, 1 April 2005 15:53:20 GMT