Hi Ed, Why would it 'very likely' not validate? The C14N phase of core validation automatically re-serializes using UTF-8, regardless of the encoding of the original document. Cheers, John Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Product Architect and Research Scientist PureEdge Solutions Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Ed Simon [mailto:edsimon@xmlsec.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 9:43 AM To: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Subject: RE: Encoding of signed document question I am under the impression that the document is signed already, and that you want to store it in a different encoding. What you do with a document after it is signed does not matter to XML Signature, however if you try to validate the signature before restoring the document to its original form, the signature will very likely not validate. Have I understood you correctly? Regards, Ed ======================================== Ed Simon (613) 726-9645 edsimon@xmlsec.com Interested in XML, Web Services, or Security? Visit "www.xmlsec.com". Now available! "Web Services Security" published by Osborne (ISBN# 0072224711) -----Original Message----- From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hess Yvan Sent: December 21, 2004 10:24 AM To: 'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org' Subject: Encoding of signed document question Hi, Do I have the right to store a signed XML document into a filesystem or a database using a different encoding than "UTF-8"? In the context of my application I have to save it using encoding "ISO-8859-1". Is it conform to specifications ? What will be the incidence of a such choice ? Thanks for your answer. Regards. Yvan HessReceived on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 17:53:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:19 GMT