W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: How much XML Signature is mature?

From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 11:59:41 -0700
To: "'Aleksey Sanin'" <aleksey@aleksey.com>
Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002701c39673$275b5bd0$6601a8c0@rainbow>


> What I meant is that not only XML DSig but several other specs including
> XPath and XInclude were also broken by 3D Secure.

I agree with that statement.

Best,

Don Park
http://www.docuverse.com/
http://www.docuverse.com/blog/donpark/

Received on Sunday, 19 October 2003 15:00:49 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Don Park: "RE: How much XML Signature is mature?"
Previous message: Rich Salz: "RE: How much XML Signature is mature?"
In reply to: Aleksey Sanin: "Re: How much XML Signature is mature?"
Next in thread: Rich Salz: "RE: How much XML Signature is mature?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:17 GMT