W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: How much XML Signature is mature?

From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey@aleksey.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 09:26:32 -0700
Message-ID: <3F92BB38.7050203@aleksey.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Cc: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>, "gino.tesei@ekar.it" <gino.tesei@ekar.it>, "w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>


>>I would say 3D-Secure is a prime example of widely used protocol based on
>>XML-Signature.
>>    
>>
>
>I thought about that, but unfortunately because they tag one of their "id"
>attributes as CDATA, and don't use legal ID-style naming.  Therefore,
>while 3D-Secure is *very close* to XML DSIG, it's not conformant.  :(
>  
>
I would re-phrase this a little bit: 3D-Secure specs are *very close* to 
XML, it's not conformant.

Aleksey
Received on Sunday, 19 October 2003 12:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:17 GMT