- From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:00:40 -0700
- To: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: <gino.tesei@ekar.it>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
I think that is just a bug in the 3D-Secure DTD which was pulled out of the spec before it was published. As to why anyone would generate invalid ID, I have no idea. Don Park http://www.docuverse.com/ http://www.docuverse.com/blog/donpark/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@datapower.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:35 PM > To: Don Park > Cc: gino.tesei@ekar.it; w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > Subject: RE: How much XML Signature is mature? > > > I would say 3D-Secure is a prime example of widely used protocol based > on > > XML-Signature. > > I thought about that, but unfortunately because they tag one of their "id" > attributes as CDATA, and don't use legal ID-style naming. Therefore, > while 3D-Secure is *very close* to XML DSIG, it's not conformant. :( > /r$ > -- > Rich Salz Chief Security Architect > DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com > XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html > XML Security Overview > http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2003 22:01:47 UTC