Re: xml-exc-c14n [Re: [xml-dev] RelaxNG question

On Monday 25 August 2003 05:59, james anderson wrote:
> > Folks proposing alternatives to namespaces might find it worthwhile to
> > look at the XML C14N spec and figure out how their alternatives can be
> > made to meet the same requirements.  (A global index of prefixes is
> > pretty easy, of course.)
>
> note to the editors:  i am surprised that xmlns="" is not handled
> differently in the apex element. it would be nice to be able to test
> this on normative examples. are there any?

I'm not sure to what you are referring, but the following has other test 
cases:
  http://www.w3.org/Signature/2002/02/01-exc-c14n-interop.html