RE: Request for clarification on Canonical XML

At 20:57 03/07/24 -0400, Rich Salz wrote:
>I would like it to be made VERY EXPLICIT that this is non-normative
>advice for those intending to use xml-c14n for something other than its
>originally intended purpose.  If the text was more than a paragraph -- or
>if it's possible to add more, so it becomes more than a paragraph -- I'd
>even rather see it as a separate W3C note.
>
>And, by the way, shouldn't we all be using exc-c14n instead of c14n
>whenever possible?

The request actually came from exc-c14n. But that one relies on c14n
for that particular aspect of its definition.


Regards,    Martin.